Lazio director Igli Tare urges Roma to put the derby loss behind them after Jose Mourinho and Tiago Pinto comments. ‘You must learn to accept defeat.’
The Aquile won 3-2 in the Serie A showdown on Sunday, but Mourinho again referenced that game after a 3-0 Europa League victory away to Zorya Luhask.
The coach insisted they had “dominated” the derby and made Lazio look “small” in comparison.
“I don’t like what Roma did in the post-match, it was a surprise to see them still talking about refereeing errors four days later when if there were any mistakes, they were damaging to Lazio,” Tare told Sky Sport Italia.
“You must learn to accept defeat and bring the best out of yourself, which is what Roma did today with their win.
“All you need to do is analyse it incident by incident to see there were no refereeing errors against Roma. If anything, they were against Lazio.
“There was a penalty not given to us, there was no reason to ask for Lucas Leiva to be sent off, and the penalty on Nicolò Zaniolo was only seen by Irrati in the VAR booth.”
Lazio, Tare: “Polemiche arbitrali di Mourinho? Non mi è piaciuto, bisogna accettare la sconfitta” https://t.co/ISn1zhByxC
— TUTTOmercatoWEB (@TuttoMercatoWeb) September 30, 2021
@Vittorio and all riomanistis around. Tare put it perfectly in the last phrase:
“There was a penalty not given to us, there was no reason to ask for Lucas Leiva to be sent off, and the penalty on Nicolò Zaniolo was only seen by Irrati in the VAR booth.”
Lazio Ultras should make a flag with Zaniolo Oscar fall.(as a reminder)
Don’t know why I’m debasing myself again by replying to you, burino, but here goes: you and Tare should pass what you’re smoking around so we can all enjoy some nice delusions. Tare’s dreaming about a Lazio penalty and, like you, easily forgets the foul and non given penalty on Zaniolo (it doesn’t matter if Zan was offside or not – VAR would take care of that AFTER the play was stopped, which means Lazio wouldn’t have a counter and go up 2:0) which would either keep the game at 1:0 or level it at 1:1.
Both of you, apparently, consider elbowing someone in the face not worthy of a yellow card. Interesting take.
As for the allegedly falsely awarded penalty – it’s a moot point. Both the penalty/offside in the first half and Leiva’s second yellow – two situations which would drastically change the course of the game – came before that. If either one of those things happened (or both if the refs weren’t clowns), it’s more likely than not that the situation in which the penalty was awarded wouldn’t even have happened.